<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Field Theory on Paul's Particles</title><link>https://paulstapel.com/categories/field-theory/</link><description>Recent content in Field Theory on Paul's Particles</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 16:22:39 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://paulstapel.com/categories/field-theory/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Special Relativity From The Ground Up</title><link>https://paulstapel.com/ground-up-special-relativity/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 16:22:39 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://paulstapel.com/ground-up-special-relativity/</guid><description>I am currently taking a course on field theory, and we are currently working with Lorentz transformations and the likes. I have never really liked the way lorentz transformations are introduced, as previously, they weren&amp;rsquo;t derived that much, and we just had to take them for granted. The book we are currently working with is also a bit lackluster when it comes to the full derivation of lorentz transformations and the likes, and so I wanted to give this derivation a shot to see if I could explain it in a more intuitive way.</description></item></channel></rss>